Showing posts with label rachel maddow. Show all posts
Showing posts with label rachel maddow. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 27, 2009

Infrastructure Isn't Sexy?



I remember Rachel Maddow once getting very excited because infrastructure was being discussed on the presidential campaign trail.

"It's not sexy," she said. "But it ought to be."

You bet, Rachel.

Our roads, our bridges, our water systems were all built during a big can-do chapter in our history, either as WPA projects during the thirties or to pave the way for the brave new world in which every garage would hold a car.

Now we have two car garages - and often more cars parked in the driveway. Our water infrastructure serves a booming population. Our water treatment systems are taxed to the limit. And it's all getting old. Concrete has a limited lifespan and we've been putting off repairs for years.

The History Channel did a special on the problem. And I did a story this morning that brings it into focus.

New York City gets much of its water from upstate. A massive, incredibly engineered system of aqueducts six hundred feet below the ground takes water from upstate reservoirs into the city's pipes. And in one small neighborhood where there was always an issue with existing groundwater, that aqueduct is leaking up to 36 million gallons of water a day. A day.

Neighbors say water gushes out of cracks in their basements. Their yards are spongy. Sinkholes open up and they can't walk their own property. The city is doing studies and has meanwhile offered sump pumps, bottled water (that high water table means wells and septics aren't isolated from each other), UV water treatment systems and funds for improved stormwater systems.

What the neighbors want, bottom line, is to be moved. They're exhausted. They say they're up all night monitoring multiple sumps pumps, worrying that the power will go out. Their homes are worthless. No one's going to buy them. They want to be moved to higher ground and the city says it's willing to consider doing just that if studies prove that the leaking aqueduct is the source of their problems. Congressman Maurice Hinchey says the city just ought to do it now - that there's no doubt that the city's water tunnel is a major contributor to the problems of 35 families unfortunate enough to own homes over a high water table and a leaking aqueduct.

What it made me wonder about was our infrastructure in general. The History Channel special featured a guy who said that America's been like the grandkids who inherited a mansion - from the outside, it's a great house. But go inside and you see it's falling apart from lack of maintenance.

Washington's been putting stimulus money into infrastructure and that's right on target. It's also a great opportunity to look at that infrastructure and see if it meets our future needs, or if we should be building the next generation's transportation and energy systems. Do we need a gazillion highways, or do we need high speed rail? Do we continue to act as if we can fuel this nation with fossil fuels forever or do we accept that we've already gone beyond the safe limits and should create clean, green systems that our children's grandchildren could use?

It's a turning point in history - the fact that so many wake up calls are coming at once makes it inescapable. We've passed peak oil. We've passed the safe carbon threshold. We're overpopulated.

It's time for the creative thinkers to stand up and speak. And it's time for the rest of us to listen.

Sunday, October 11, 2009

Bill Moyers Is My Hero

Moyers is out there digging up the dirt to see what's underneath, accompanied on television, mostly, by Jon Stewart. If you haven't seen Stewart's feature on Timothy Geithner's real estate issues, it's worth a watch. But this post is about corruption at the top. And the press, with just a few exceptions, is ignoring it.

What a pitiful state of affairs. Go sit in the corner, Anderson. Sit on the dunce seat, Wolf. Fox, never mind. Rachel, you go, girl. But don't just focus on marketing firms - start making noise at the top.

America, World, watch and weep. This is what we are right now. It's all about money.


Saturday, February 7, 2009

Why I Love Rachel Maddow




I'm no groupie. I'm not a gay activist. I hate television and I hate myself when I sit in front of it, mindlessly flipping around.

But I love Rachel Maddow and an hour with her makes me feel pretty damned good about our chances.

Rachel, if you have somehow missed her, is the snarky host of MSNBC's The Rachel Maddow Show. She's got a radio show on Air America. She's the smart ass kid you wanted on your softball team, and she's all grown up and poking holes in political stupidity - no matter what side of the aisle it's on.

Ignore what MSNBC's done to make her acceptable to mainstream America - turned a shortstop into a glamor girl with flappy eyelashes. Listen to her.

She's intelligent, she backs up her opinions with fact, and she cares. When she's outraged, she doesn't mince any words. But she never descends into shrill rants. Take a note, Fox News. Aw, let's be even handed here - Keith Olbermann might want to borrow a page from his protege as well.

Last night, Rachel discussed the stimulus.

She devoted her show to debunking what she called "bull pucky" arguments against the stimulus plan, and arguing against the compromises that were made to get it past the GOP objections.

She gave facts and figures showing that tax cuts don't stimulate the economy nearly as well as infrastructure spending and funding food stamps. And she was clearly outraged that common sense gets shouted down by partisan fighting. She cited studies I've heard before but she gave them a national voice, and she said what I've been thinking myself. If Congress can't shut up, grow up and get to work bailing out this boat, it's time to toss them overboard.

And I'm predicting when this time passes, when history looks back, Rachel Maddow, along with Jon Stewart, are going to prove to be two of the most important voices for this era.









http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908/

Wednesday, December 17, 2008

Cheney Okayed Waterboarding: It's Not Torture

MSNBC's Rachel Maddow doesn't usually stutter. She's the queen of smooth. But she was stuttering with disbelief last night and I can't argue.

The vice president of the United States confirmed, in a taped interview, that he authorized the use of an interrogation technique that we labeled torture after it was used against our soldiers in World War II.

Let me say that another way: the use of waterboarding was called a war crime after World War II. Maddow, clearly beyond outrage, pointed out the people responsible were hanged. Our vice president confidently confirms that he authorized the use of this technique at the prison camp at Guantanamo. He stands by his actions.

A plus B equals...you know. Waterboard equals war crime plus official okay equals...war criminal.
But this one's safe, isn't he? We haven't stood up to any of this yet, why would we start now?

Where is the tidal wave of public anger? Where are the headlines? Where are the editorials calling for him to be indicted? I'm not seeing much. Just for the basic story I had to go to the Seattle Times.

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/ABPub/2006/10/25/2003323270.jpg


You're not angry yet? You don't feel like a chump? Why don't you look at what our vice president was saying two years ago. At what point do we finally stand up, confront this evil and condemn it? No time to read the whole article? It reports on Cheney's defense of waterboarding as a no-brainer, while reiterating his belief that this country doesn't torture. In 2006. Oh. My. God.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2006/oct/27/usa.guantanamo

And just in case you're still not angry, please remember that Friday is the day the Bush Administration has quietly offered 300 thousand acres of wilderness in Utah's red rock area for gas and oil companies leases. We voted for change - isn't it time we did something to help create it ourselves? Write!

http://www.nrdcactionfund.org/wilderness_giveaway